CHEAPEST INPUT TODAY Nova Micro $0.035/MBLENDED PRICE SPREAD 1102× (Nova Micro → GPT-5.4 Pro)128 MODELS · 16 PROVIDERS re-checked every morning by a GitHub ActionFOLLOW PRICE CHANGES commit feed → Data & Alerts

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5

Anthropic against OpenAI, costed on the same three workloads. Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper on all three workloads.

Run this comparison on your own numbers

Monthly bill, side by side

WorkloadClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5Difference
Support chatbot
2,500 six-turn conversations a day
$20,138 $22,163 $2,025 (+10%)
Document summarizer
1,000 single-shot summaries a day
$2,430 $2,550 $120 (+5%)
Coding agent
200 twelve-turn sessions a day
$14,040 $14,940 $900 (+6%)

No prompt caching and no batch discount on either side, so the comparison is like for like. Both figures assume 30 days a month.

The rate cards

Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5
Input, per 1M tokens$5$5
Output, per 1M tokens$25$30
Cached input$0.5$0.5
Context window1M1.05M
Maximum output128K128K
Reasoning modelyesyes
Visionyesyes

Beyond the price

Run this comparison on your own numbers

Full detail: Claude Opus 4.8 pricing · GPT-5.5 pricing

More comparisons

Other head-to-heads that include Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?

Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper on all three workloads.

How much would Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 cost each month?

On PromptSpend's standard workloads, per month: support chatbot: Claude Opus 4.8 $20,138, GPT-5.5 $22,163 (Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper by $2,025); document summarizer: Claude Opus 4.8 $2,430, GPT-5.5 $2,550 (Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper by $120); coding agent: Claude Opus 4.8 $14,040, GPT-5.5 $14,940 (Claude Opus 4.8 is cheaper by $900). No prompt caching and no batch discount is assumed.

How do Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 differ apart from price?

GPT-5.5 reads up to 1.05M tokens of context in one request; Claude Opus 4.8 stops at 1M.

Standard-tier, global-endpoint list prices in USD. This build read the catalog generated 2026-11-11.