Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K2.6
Google against Moonshot AI, costed on the same three workloads. Kimi K2.6 is cheaper on all three workloads.
Monthly bill, side by side
| Workload | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Kimi K2.6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chatbot 2,500 six-turn conversations a day |
$6,041 | $3,522 | $2,519 (1.7×) |
| Document summariser 1,000 single-shot summaries a day |
$729 | $444 | $285 (1.6×) |
| Coding agent 200 twelve-turn sessions a day |
$4,212 | $2,533 | $1,679 (1.7×) |
No prompt caching and no batch discount on either side, so the comparison is like for like. Both figures assume 30 days a month.
The rate cards
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $1.5 | $0.95 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $7.5 | $4 |
| Cached input | $0.15 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Maximum output | 66K | 262K |
| Reasoning model | yes | yes |
| Vision | yes | yes |
Run this comparison on your own numbers
Full detail: Gemini 3.6 Flash pricing · Kimi K2.6 pricing