Kimi K2.5 vs GLM-5
Moonshot AI against Z.ai (GLM), costed on the same three workloads. Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on all three workloads.
Monthly bill, side by side
| Workload | Kimi K2.5 | GLM-5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chatbot 2,500 six-turn conversations a day |
$2,417 | $3,299 | $882 (+36%) |
| Document summariser 1,000 single-shot summaries a day |
$292 | $443 | $151 (1.5×) |
| Coding agent 200 twelve-turn sessions a day |
$1,685 | $2,484 | $799 (+47%) |
No prompt caching and no batch discount on either side, so the comparison is like for like. Both figures assume 30 days a month.
The rate cards
| Kimi K2.5 | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.6 | $1 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $3 | $3.2 |
| Cached input | $0.1 | $0.2 |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Maximum output | 262K | 128K |
| Reasoning model | yes | yes |
| Vision | yes | no |
Run this comparison on your own numbers
Full detail: Kimi K2.5 pricing · GLM-5 pricing